Simmons-Myers v. Caesars Entm't Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “mere negligence is not enough” when evaluating executive action in the context of a right to privacy claim involving medical records
• noting the Second Circuit \ha[s] explicitly recognized the right to privacy in one's personal information\
• noting “it is well settled that an amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect’
• noting “it is well settled that an amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect”
• noting “it is well settled that an amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect”
• explaining the court applies the ‘rights’ approach to legislation and the ‘shocks the conscience’ test to executive action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).