Simmons Ford, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the challenged statement in light of the meaning conveyed by the remainder of article
• finding no actual malice when defendants published a reasonable but mistaken interpretation of a regulation that \hardly qualify[ed] as a model of clarity\
• “Given this background, plaintiffs’ reputa-tional interest in avoiding further adverse comment regarding the safety and performance of CitiCar is minimal when compared with the First Amendment interests at stake.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).