Skip to main content
· 9/9/1983

Simko, Inc. v. Graymar Co.

Citations

  • 464 A.2d 1104
  • 55 Md. App. 561
  • 1983 Md. App. LEXIS 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that if a restrictive covenant is bargained for at the commencement of employment there is consideration for the agreement
  • upholding enforcement of a restrictive covenant where a salesman was ordered to sign or face discharge
  • upholding enforcement of a restrictive covenant where a salesman was ordered to sign or face discharge
  • \[T]he continuation of employment for a substantial period beyond the threat of discharge is sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant.\
  • \[T]he continuation of employment for a substantial period beyond the threat of discharge is sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant.\
  • “[T]he continuation of employment for a substantial period beyond the threat of discharge is sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weant, Getty, Blackwell, Seventh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.