Silverton Enterprises, Inc. v. General Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[n]o right to appeal exists from an order denying a motion to reconsider which presents the same issues as those determined in the order or judgment sought to be reconsidered”
• Ver Hagen addresses the concern that a motion for reconsideration should not be used to extend the time to appeal an order or judgment when that time has expired
• “No right of appeal exists from an order 6 No. 2020AP741 denying a motion to reconsider which presents the same issues as those determined in the order or judgment sought to be reconsidered.”
• the rule is animated by the concern “that a motion for reconsideration should not be used as a ploy to extend the time to appeal from [a final] order or judgment when the time to appeal [that order or judgment] had expired”
• care, cústody and control exclusion is a coverage clause
• the rule is animated by the 11 No. 2025AP1916 concern “that a motion for reconsideration should not be used as a ploy to extend the time to appeal from [a final] order or judgment when the time to appeal [that order or judgment] had expired”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).