Massachusetts Appeals Court· 3/26/1974
Silverstein v. Silverstein
Citations
- 308 N.E.2d 773
- 2 Mass. App. Ct. 94
- 1974 Mass. App. LEXIS 609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Nothing in the language of [G. L. c. 208, § 21,] authorizes a judge to foreshorten [the nisi period]”
- nisi period gives interested party time to challenge decree's validity
- nisi period gives interested party time to challenge decree’s validity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hale, Rose, Goodman, Grant, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Zildjian v. ZildjianMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-06-29· cited 29×
- Asker v. AskerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-11-08· cited 19×
- Estate of Ladd v. Estate of LaddSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-01-14· cited 11×
- Singer v. SingerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-07-12· cited 9×
- Onello v. TwomeyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-12-24· cited 2×
- Hamilton v. HamiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-06-05· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.