Skip to main content
· 3/23/2010

Silverstein v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Citations

  • 704 F. Supp. 2d 1077
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28147
  • 2010 WL 1258032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding liberty interest in avoiding indefinite stay in segregated confinement, but no interest in avoiding transfer to the ADX from other similar facility
  • dismissing the plaintiff’s procedural due process claim, because “Mr. Silverstein’s transfer to an administrative segregation facility did not represent a substantial alteration of the conditions of his confinement”
  • “No case has held that prisoners have an absolute entitlement to the eventual release from solitary confinement.”
  • “Where . . . the entity is also named, there is no need for an official-capacity claim.”
  • “Where . . . the entity is also named, there is no need for an official- capacity claim.”
  • “Notice of the factual basis underlying one’s segregated confinement and a fair opportunity for rebuttal ‘are among the most important procedural mechanisms for purposes of avoiding erroneous deprivations’ of liberty interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Philip A. Brimmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.