· 3/23/2010
Silverstein v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Citations
- 704 F. Supp. 2d 1077
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28147
- 2010 WL 1258032
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding liberty interest in avoiding indefinite stay in segregated confinement, but no interest in avoiding transfer to the ADX from other similar facility
- dismissing the plaintiff’s procedural due process claim, because “Mr. Silverstein’s transfer to an administrative segregation facility did not represent a substantial alteration of the conditions of his confinement”
- “No case has held that prisoners have an absolute entitlement to the eventual release from solitary confinement.”
- “Where . . . the entity is also named, there is no need for an official-capacity claim.”
- “Where . . . the entity is also named, there is no need for an official- capacity claim.”
- “Notice of the factual basis underlying one’s segregated confinement and a fair opportunity for rebuttal ‘are among the most important procedural mechanisms for purposes of avoiding erroneous deprivations’ of liberty interests.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Philip A. Brimmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.