Skip to main content
· 4/12/1897

Silverman v. Rumbarger

Citations

  • 4 Pa. Super. 439
  • 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 140

Syllabus

<p>Evidence — Presumption of legality — Burden of proof.</p> <p>It is a presumption of law that every one has conformed to the law and the burden is upon him who alleges the contrary.</p> <p>Sale — Illegal business — Burden upon Mm alleging illegality.</p> <p>The plaintiff who had sold whisky to defendant, testified that he was a wholesale liquor dealer in Ohio where the contract was made; this was prima facie proof that he was lawfully carrying on that business and the burden was upon defendant to show that he had a right to take, use and not be compelled to pay for the property purchased because plaintiff was carrying on a traffic illegal in the state of Ohio.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Orlady, Reeder, Smith, Wickham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.