Silverman v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court must interpret provisions of a contract in light of entire document
• policy provided that certain words and phrases “have special meaning throughout this policy and appear in boldface type when used”
• “We reject Economy’s argument that ‘loss’ has the same meaning everywhere it appears in the policy, boldface type or not. The policy carefully and sensibly limits the applicability of the defined ‘loss.’”
• treating “loss” and “loss” as different terms
• treating “loss” and “loss” as different terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).