Silverman v. CBS INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that neither the exhibition of a work to the public (general publication) nor the distribution of tangible copies of a work to a limited class of persons for a limited purpose (limited publication) injected a work into the public domain
• “Cartoons, and other graphic representations of characters, have been afforded greater copyright protection than characters described only by words.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).