Silvera v. Employers Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when the legislature amends a statute without changing the language previously interpreted by the supreme court, it is presumed that the legislature approves the court’s interpretation
• stating that when the legislature amends a statute without changing the language previously interpreted by the supreme court, it is presumed that the legislature approves the court's interpretation
• stating that when the Legislature has had the opportunity to change the law as interpreted by this court and does not do so, it is presumed that this court’s interpretation accurately reflects legislative intent
• explaining that when this court interprets a statute and the Legislature subsequently amends the statute without changing the interpreted language, it is presumed that the Legislature approved of this court's interpretation
• explaining that when this court interprets a statute and the Legislature subsequently amends the statute without changing the interpreted language, it is presumed that the Legislature approved of this court's interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).