Skip to main content
· 3/5/2009

Silver v. Colorado Casualty Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 219 P.3d 324
  • 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 332
  • 2009 WL 540653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a division of this court is not at liberty to disregard a rule announced in a prior supreme court case absent “some clear indication” that the supreme court has overruled its prior case
  • noting that the 5 court of appeals is not at liberty to disregard a rule announced in a supreme court case without “some clear indication” that the case has been overruled
  • assuming without deciding \that a defense of rescission based on an allegation of fraud is subject to the pleading requirements of Rule 9[b]\
  • “[W]e are not at liberty to disregard that rule absent some clear indication that the Colorado Supreme Court has overruled it.”
  • The court of appeals is not “at liberty to disregard” a rule established by the supreme court “absent some clear indication” that the supreme court “has overruled it.”
  • The court of appeals is not “at liberty to disregard” a rule established by the supreme court “absent some clear indication” that the supreme court “has overruled it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.