Silvas v. Speros Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a question for the jury as 28 to whether the defendant should have anticipated the harm that occurred, despite the fact 1 that the plaintiff knew and appreciated the danger of holes in the roof of a construction 2 job
• “The trial court erred in not submitting the case to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).