Silvas v. ETrade Mortgage Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that general claims regarding fees and disclosure are preempted by HOLA
• California law requiring federal savings associations to refund mortgage “lock-in fees” field preempted based on HOLA and OTS regulations
• preempted state law alleged to preclude charging an interest rate lock-in mortgage fee
• “[I]f a party fails to raise an objection to an issue before judgment, he or she waives the right to challenge the issue on appeal.” (citations and internal quotations omitted)
• “[I]f a party fails to raise an objection to an issue before judgment, he or she waives the right to challenge the issue on appeal.” (quoting Doi v. Halekulani Corp., 276 F.3d 1181, 1140 (9th Cir. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).