Silva v. Steadfast Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in the context of assessing a grant of summary judgment to the insurer on the plaintiff's chapter 176D claim, that \the boundaries of what may qualify for consideration as a [G.L.] c. 93A violation is a question of law\ (alteration in original
• stating, in the context of assessing a grant of summary judgment to the insurer on the plaintiff's chapter 176D claim, that “the boundaries of what may qualify for consideration as a [G.L.] c. 93A violation is a question of law” (alteration in original
• affirming summary judgment for insurer on chapter 176D, section 3(9)(f) claim because insured, rather than seeking to enforce a judgment in his favor or make a settlement request, appealed the judgment and so \open[ed] up both the scope of liability and the amount of damages\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).