Silva v. Chertoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[c]ourts examine all the information presented to the agency to determine 12 what allegations would reasonably be expected to grow from the agency’s investigation” (Emphasis added.)
• stating that \[c]ourts examine all the information presented to the agency to determine what allegations would reasonably be expected to grow from the agency's investigation\ (Emphasis added.)
• examining all documents but deciding allegations in documents did not present sufficient factual predicate for alternative argument
• examining all documents but deciding allegations in documents did not present sufficient factual predicate for alternative argument
• granting summary judgment when nothing in charge indicated that employer misperceived nature of plaintiff’s condition or ability to engage in major life activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).