Silurian Oil Co. v. Essley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that dissemination of unfavorable job reference concerning former employee was adverse employment action under Title VII “because it was a ‘personnel action’ motivated by retaliatory animus”
• recognizing that temporal proximity does not necessarily “refute the 9 government’s proffered legitimate reasons” for an action
• holding that contact with an EEO counselor was \protected activity\
• holding that although temporal proximity may suffice to support a 'minimal prima facie case of retaliation,' it is insufficient to carry the plaintiff's burden \of establishing a triable issue of fact on the ultimate question\ of retaliation
• determining that meeting 20 with an Equal Employment Opportunity counselor to discuss sex and race discrimination constitutes protected activity
• determining that meeting with an Equal Employment Opportunity counselor to discuss sex and race discrimination constitutes protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).