SILO POINT II LLC v. Suffolk Const. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a clause using “courts of the [state]” was “unambiguously expressed in terms of sovereignty and therefore exclude[d] federal courts”
• “As a result [of the parties not disputing the validity of the forum selection clause], the only question that remains to be decided ... is the interpretation of the forum selection clause and whether it permits [the plaintiff] to institute suit in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).