Silmon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “in prosecutions for adultery or for illicit sexual intercourse of any class, evidence is admissible of sexual acts between the parties prior to, or when indicating continu-ousness of illicit relations, even subsequent to the act specifically under trial”
• stating “in prosecutions for adultery or for illicit sexual intercourse of any class, evidence is admissible of sexual acts between the parties prior to, or when indicating continuousness of illicit relations, even subsequent to the act specifically under trial”
• stating “in prosecutions for adultery or for illicit sexual intercourse of any class, evidence is admissible of sexual acts between the parties prior to, or when indicating continuousness of illicit relations, even - 15 - J-S44016-24 subsequent to the act specifically under trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).