Sille v. Shaffer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff established a boundary by acquiescence and remanding “for entry of a judgment quieting title to the disputed tract in the plaintiff”
• holding that plaintiff established a boundary by acquiescence and remanding “for entry of a judgment quieting title to the disputed tract in the plaintiff”
• stating that one party had exercised dominion over the later-disputed property by maintaining and improving the property
• stating that a boundary by acquiescence must be “definitely marked by fence or in some manner”
• stating that a boundary by acquiescence must be “definitely marked by fence or in some manner”
• holding the district court’s few evidentiary rulings excluding evidence did not prevent a de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).