Silk v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Eighth Amendment claim based on assertion that the plaintiff received only one cup of fruit as one of the six meals he received in one day
• rejecting Eighth Amendment claim based on assertion that the plaintiff received only one cup of fruit as one of the six meals he received in one day
• “Sims did not allege that he was denied sufficient food on a daily basis or that he could not maintain his health based on the diet provided him”
• “Because the MDOC is a state agency and the State of Michigan has not consented to civil rights suits in the federal courts, the MDOC is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).