Skip to main content
· 7/30/2015

Silk v. Board of Trustees, Moraine Valley Community College, District No. 524

Citations

  • 795 F.3d 698
  • 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1548
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13282
  • 2015 WL 4571171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing EEOC complaint satisfies statutorily- protected activity element under ADA
  • “In satisfying the ‘regarded as’ prong, Silk must show that the College perceived him as having an impairment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.