Siliven v. Indiana Department of Child Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that removal of child to grandmother's house was justified by reasonable suspicion, even though it was \far from clear\ that \the state's interest would have justified a greater intrusion on the [plaintiffs'] right to familial integrity\
• explaining that the state has a “strong interest in protecting children from abuse” and must take reasonable action in light of the particular facts known to it
• explaining that where the court already “con- cluded that the evidence was sufficient to establish probable cause” it followed that the evidence “must also be sufficient to satisfy the less demanding reasonable suspicion stand- ard”
• explaining that where the court already “con- cluded that the evidence was sufficient to establish probable cause” it followed that the evidence “must also be sufficient to satisfy the less demanding reasonable suspicion stand- ard”
• explaining that where the court already “con- cluded that the evidence was sufficient to establish probable cause” it followed that the evidence “must also be sufficient to satisfy the less demanding reasonable suspicion stand- ard”
• explaining that where the court already “con- cluded that the evidence was sufficient to establish probable cause” it followed that the evidence “must also be sufficient to satisfy the less demanding reasonable suspicion stand- ard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).