Siler v. Department of Employment Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This indicated that the legislature intended that persons discharged for incapacity, inadvertence, negligence or inability to perform assigned tasks should receive unemployment benefits”
• amendment “intended that persons discharged for incapacity, inadvertence, negligence or inability to perform assigned tasks should receive unemployment benefits”
• “Merely not ‘following correct procedures’ or disregarding ‘the employer’s requirements as to safety and sanitation’ ” did not amount to misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).