D. Colorado· 10/22/1996
Silchia v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
Citations
- 942 F. Supp. 1369
- 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2934
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15965
- 1996 WL 617312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a disclaimer under the “Notifications” section of employer’s policy that was “set off in its own paragraph” that related “solely to employment at will” was clear and conspicuous
- finding summary judgment appropriate on a promissory es-toppel claim where company policies contained valid disclaimers
- finding late disclosure substantially justified where party only learned of witness’s existence after the discovery deadline and opposing party did not seek leave to depose before summary judgment motion hearing
- “[T]he effect of the two disclaimers taken together also results in no employment contract between the parties.”
- employee’s reliance on statements by employees other than those authorized under company policies to alter employee’s employment status was unreasonable
- disclaimer language is sufficiently conspicuous where it is set off in its own paragraph with the subject of the paragraph “Employment at Will” highlighted in bold and in upper case letters
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Babcock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jaynes v. Centura Health Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-06-29· cited 28×
- West v. Hsu (In Re Advanced Modular Power Systems, Inc.)S.D. Texas· 2009-09-16· cited 24×
- Hunter v. the Buckle, Inc.D. Kansas· 2007-05-29· cited 8×
- Winkler v. Bowlmor AMFD. Colorado· 2016-09-12· cited 7×
- Tonjes v. Park Cnty. Sheriff's OfficeD. Colorado· 2018-01-04· cited 6×
- Trujillo v. Atmos Energy Corp.D. Colorado· 2012-06-25· cited 5×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 2,980×
- David L. White v. York International CorporationTenth Circuit· 1995-01-05· cited 725×
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-01-20· cited 461×
- Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-08-08· cited 302×
- National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 282×
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1980-06-11· cited 264×
- Carmela Mares v. Conagra Poultry Company, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1992-07-17· cited 190×
- Kiely v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-10-11· cited 80×
- Myron Durtsche, Jr. v. American Colloid CompanyTenth Circuit· 1992-04-03· cited 79×
- Vigoda v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-06-07· cited 67×
- Cronk v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals· 1988-07-21· cited 63×
- Peabody Galion, a Division of Peabody International Corporation v. A. v. DollarTenth Circuit· 1981-12-11· cited 62×
- Ferrera v. NielsenColorado Court of Appeals· 1990-09-20· cited 48×
- Gold Coast Restaurant Corporation D/B/A Bryant & Cooper Steakhouse v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 1993-06-11· cited 37×
- Therrien v. United Air Lines, Inc.D. Colorado· 1987-10-07· cited 34×
- Evenson v. Colorado Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-03-03· cited 33×
- Keokuk Gas Service Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardEighth Circuit· 1978-07-26· cited 24×
- Thompson v. Public Service Co. of Colo.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-10-22· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.