Silbersack v. ACandS, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, upon determining that certification was not sufficiently justified, ‘Tthis Court and the Court of Special Appeals] have ‘not hesitated to countermand the entry of a judgment under Rule 2-602(b
• acknowledging that the trial judge “normally has a much better grasp of the situation than an appellate court” and is therefore viewed as the “dispatcher” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• explaining that the purpose of Rule 2-602(b) is to prevent piecemeal appeals
• “[T]here is a long-standing bedrock rule of appellate jurisdiction, practice, and procedure that, unless otherwise provided by law, the right to seek appellate review ... ordinarily must await the entry of a final judgment that disposes of all claims against all parties.”
• “[An] appellate court’s authority under Rule 8-602(e)(l)(C) to enter judgment on its own initiative may be exercised only when the circuit court has never exercised its own discretion in the matter and not when the trial court was asked to enter judgment under Rule 2-602(b
• “[An] appellate court’s authority under Rule 8-602(e)(l)(C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).