Skip to main content
· 5/29/2009

Sikorski v. Whorton

Citations

  • 631 F. Supp. 2d 1327
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46323
  • 2009 WL 1520053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding under Turner practice of returning mail unopened when it contains tape or stickers
  • “Due Process [ ] does not require defendants to provide plaintiffs notice and an opportunity to appeal the decision . . . regarding mail that was returned to the sender because of noticeable violations on the outside of the envelope . . . . ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larry R. Hicks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.