· 10/2/2023
Signey v. Pfaff
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that government had a substantial interest in maintaining parks in Washington, D.C., in \an attractive and intact condition\
- finding that ample alternative channels remained for communicating intended political message despite restrictions on sleeping in Lafayette Park
- applying O’Brien to evaluate the application of a general camping ban to a demonstra tion in the park
- applying intermediate scrutiny under the First Amendment to regulation prohibiting camping on national parks in Washington, D.C.
- applying intermediate scrutiny under the First Amendment to regula- tion prohibiting camping on national parks in Washington, D.C.
- discussing \the Government's substantial interest in maintaining the parks ... in an attractive and intact condition\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.