Skip to main content
· 10/2/2023

Signey v. Pfaff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that government had a substantial interest in maintaining parks in Washington, D.C., in \an attractive and intact condition\
  • finding that ample alternative channels remained for communicating intended political message despite restrictions on sleeping in Lafayette Park
  • applying O’Brien to evaluate the application of a general camping ban to a demonstra­ tion in the park
  • applying intermediate scrutiny under the First Amendment to regulation prohibiting camping on national parks in Washington, D.C.
  • applying intermediate scrutiny under the First Amendment to regula- tion prohibiting camping on national parks in Washington, D.C.
  • discussing \the Government's substantial interest in maintaining the parks ... in an attractive and intact condition\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.