Signal 88 v. Lyconic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the right of presence does not exist where the resentencing “concerns issues that are purely ministerial in nature”
• explaining that while a fifteen-year mandatory minimum requirement limited the trial court’s discretion at the original sentencing hearing, the removal of that requirement restored sentencing discretion to the trial judge, and thus “the resentencing was no longer a ministerial act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).