Skip to main content
· 12/4/2007

Sign Innovation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 937 A.2d 623
  • 2007 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the “[c]laimant’s theory mixes apples and oranges, i.e., a body impairment and actual ability to work”
  • observing that the “[c]laimant’s theory mixes apples and oranges, i.e., a body impairment and actual ability to work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pellegrini, Jubelirer, Leavitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.