Sigmar v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Pros-tok and stating “issues that either were or should have been litigated in a prior judicial proceeding, including a bankruptcy proceeding, cannot be relitigated in a subsequent proceeding that would have the effect of avoiding the prior court order or judgment”
• \collateral attack seeks to avoid the binding effect of a judgment in order to obtain specific relief that the judgment currently impedes\
• there was “no dispute” that a bankruptcy court’s final order satisfied the first element of claim preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).