Sigman v. Aetna Life Insurance (In Re Sigman)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recoupment by health insurance company of over- payments due to debtor’s receipt of Social Security benefits was not a violation of discharge injunction
• finding recoupment by health insurance company of overpay-ments due to the debtor’s receipt of Social Security benefits was permissible and not a violation of the discharge injunction
• “The right to recoupment does not give a right to actual payment^] it is not a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).