Sigma Industries, Inc. v. Sigma Instruments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant who failed to state “even one ground for granting the motion” failed to meet the standard of “reasonable specification”
• finding that defendant’s Rule 59(e) motion \failed to state even one ground for granting the motion and thus failed to meet the minimal standard of ’reasonable specification’\
• court rejected party’s attempt in effect to extend filing deadline by filing a timely, skeletal motion that specified no grounds for the motion and supplementing the motion with specific grounds after the ten-day deadline had passed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).