· 8/31/1966
Sigma Chi Fraternity v. Regents of University of Colorado
Citations
- 258 F. Supp. 515
- 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Board of Regents is a \body politic\ which is distinct from the executive branch of government
- due process was not violated when party was given opportunity to testify before board, but declined to do so
- power to regulate affairs of University includes resolution mandating probationary status for fraternities denying membership to any person due to race, color or religion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breitenstein, Chilson, Doyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.