Skip to main content
· 8/31/1966

Sigma Chi Fraternity v. Regents of University of Colorado

Citations

  • 258 F. Supp. 515
  • 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Board of Regents is a \body politic\ which is distinct from the executive branch of government
  • due process was not violated when party was given opportunity to testify before board, but declined to do so
  • power to regulate affairs of University includes resolution mandating probationary status for fraternities denying membership to any person due to race, color or religion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breitenstein, Chilson, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.