Sigler v. Woanski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing the plaintiff from two claimed comparators because he lied repeatedly during the company's investigation of his conduct
• no do-over allowed in the appellate court when lawyer bypassed ample opportunity to present all available evidence to the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).