Skip to main content
· 7/27/2011

Siggers v. Campbell

Citations

  • 652 F.3d 681
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15391
  • 2011 WL 3134354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an ongoing violation excusing the deadlines may be found when the grievance itself regards an ongoing, chronic issue
  • “suggesting that prisoner may state claim if he shows “one, continuing harm and government indifference”
  • finding that plaintiff’s earlier grievance did not cover subsequent events, because although the acts involved rejecting mail, the rejections were different, discrete, and were rejected for different reasons
  • distinguishing Johnson and another case finding exhaustion, because in those cases the underlying com- plaint was the same
  • requiring prisoner alleging issuance of retaliatory misconduct ticket to raise the issue of retaliation in the misconduct hearing and appeal process
  • granting summary judgment for warden who merely approved notices filed against the inmate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Cole, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.