Sifford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that State’s election to proceed on single offense cures any misjoinder error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ponder v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-27· cited 21×
• Romine v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-03-23· cited 16×
• Warmowski v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1992-01-08· cited 6×
• Dieter Heinz Werner v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-02-21· cited 5×
• Hubbard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-29· cited 2×
• Cowan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-30· cited 1×
• David Sidwell Jenson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-08-19
• James Eric Hooten v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-06-10
• Bryan Deion Williams v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2013-10-17
• Troy E. Dove v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2020-01-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hoffert v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-28· cited 64×
• Campbell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1956-05-09· cited 28×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1912-01-10· cited 19×
• Sifford v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1986-02-06· cited 8×