Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a filing restriction was too broad in restricting future filings as to any defendant
• holding that a filing restriction was too broad in restricting filings on any subject-matter
• “[T]here is no constitutional right of access to the courts to prosecute an action that is frivolous or malicious.”
• “[T]he right of access to the courts is neither absolute nor unconditional.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Federal courts have the inherent power to regulate the activities of abusive litigants by imposing carefully tailored restrictions under the appropriate circumstances.”
• “It is not reasonable for a court in this Circuit to speak on behalf of courts in other circuits in the country; those courts are capable of taking appropriate action on their own.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).