Tenth Circuit· 11/14/2006

Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Ass'n

Citations

469 F.3d 1340
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a filing restriction was too broad in restricting future filings as to any defendant
holding that a filing restriction was too broad in restricting filings on any subject-matter
“[T]here is no constitutional right of access to the courts to prosecute an action that is frivolous or malicious.”
“[T]he right of access to the courts is neither absolute nor unconditional.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“Federal courts have the inherent power to regulate the activities of abusive litigants by imposing carefully tailored restrictions under the appropriate circumstances.”
“It is not reasonable for a court in this Circuit to speak on behalf of courts in other circuits in the country; those courts are capable of taking appropriate action on their own.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Baldock, Barrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.