Siesel v. Siesel
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4137
Syllabus
Duhart. (1) Affirming denial of appellant's motion for a second extension of time to file objections, where the first extension of time had already elapsed and where the trial court had already issued a judgment entry adopting the magistrate's report. (2) Affirming denial of appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate the decision adopting the magistrate's report, as appellant failed to establish excusable neglect.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ALJ's observation that claimant wore a brace and used a cane when “no treating physician had prescribed these assistive devices” provided little, if any, support to discredit his testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.