Sierra v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an inadmissible alien is legally considered to be detained at the border and thus has no due process interest in release on parole
• holding, before Demore was decided, that “§ 1226(e) does not ‘speak[ ] with sufficient clarity to bar jurisdiction pursuant to the general habeas statute’” (alterations in original) (quoting INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 313 (2001))
• holding, before Demore was decided, that “§ 1226(e) does not ‘speak[ ] with sufficient clarity to bar jurisdiction pursuant to the general habeas statute’” (alterations in original) (quoting INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 313 (2001))
• holding, before Demore was decided, that “§ 1226(e) does not ‘speak[ ] with sufficient clarity to bar jurisdiction pursuant to the general habeas statute’ ” (alterations in original) (quoting INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 313 (2001))
• “We have an independent duty to examine issues relating to our jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).