Sierra Club—Grand Canyon Chapter v. Arizona Corp. Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to the Commission’s reliance on evidence even after the opponent of the rate claimed the decision “was based on speculative evidence that ‘defied credibility’”
• finding this court will defer to the Commission’s factual conclusions if supported by substantial evidence, unless such conclusions are arbitrary or unlawful (quotation omitted)
• finding dispositive holding on one issue renders it unnecessary to address other issues
• appellate courts are not bound by Commission’s legal conclusions and must “determine independently whether the Commission erred in its interpretation of the law”
• \Substantial evidence is evidence which would permit a reasonable person to reach the Commission's result.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).