Sierra Club v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing a substantive NFMA challenge rather than a procedural NEPA challenge
• “[T]he environmental groups [may not] ... challenge an entire program by simply identifying specific allegedly-improper final agency actions within that program ... ”
• “past, ongoing, and future timber sales approved by Forest Service” not limited to discrete final agency actions
• “past, ongoing, and future timber sales approved by Forest Service” not 16 limited to discrete final agency actions
• “Absent a specific and final agency action, we lack jurisdiction to consider a challenge to agency conduct.”
• en 7 Case: 23-50869 Document: 181-1 Page: 50 Date Filed: 11/27/2024 No. 23-50869 banc

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).