Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s jurisdiction to amend a preliminary injunction pending appeal because it was “more appropriately characterized as a modification—as opposed to a dissolution” and because it “maintain[ed] the status quo.”
• instructing courts to consider the possibility of curing such prejudices by granting a continuance, the Fifth Circuit makes clear that the goal is for the opposing party to muster an adequate response
• considering prejudice to the opposing party for allowing a witness to testify
• \[A] court need only make a `reasonable approximation' of economic benefit when calculating a penalty under the CWA.\
• “We review a district court’s holding on the issue of standing de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).