Skip to main content
· 6/10/1999

Sierra Club Foundation v. Graham

Citations

  • 85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 726
  • 72 Cal. App. 4th 1135
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4581
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 5849
  • 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that post-dismissal settlement was “[ jrelevant to the issue of [defendant’s] state of mind for purposes of the malicious prosecution”
  • rejecting argument that post-dismissal settlement was “[ ]relevant to the issue of [defendant’s] state of mind for purposes of the mali- cious prosecution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reardon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.