Sierra Club, Etc. v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Forest Service’s actions, by allowing the clear-cutting of two hundred feet of old-growth hardwood trees, “impair[ed] the [woodpeckers’] ‘essential behavioral patterns, including ... sheltering,’ and thus results in a violation of section 9” (citation omitted
• finding the government's argument waived because the government originally \sought review under the standard it now challenges\
• finding Forest Service's management of timber stands was a taking of the red-cockaded woodpecker in violation of the ESA
• enjoining the United States Forest Service from even-aged lumbering following documentation by scientists of a dramatic decline in active Red Cockaded Woodpecker colonies and findings by the court tracing the decline directly to Service's lumbering practices
• enjoining the United States Forest Service from even- aged lumbering following documentation by scientists of a dramatic decline in active Red Cockaded Woodpecker colonies and findings by the court tracing the decline directly to Service's lumbering practices
• It is a \cardinal rule of appellate review that a party may not challenge as error a ruling or other trial proceeding invited by [a] party\(internal quotations and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).