Sierra Club and William O'Neil v. John O. Marsh, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in an action before the district court, no new rationalizations for the agency’s decision should be included, and if included, they should be disregarded
• finding that the supplemental \affidavits d[id] not contain any 'facts' about the proposed project that [were] not also included in the . . . administrative record\
• impact reasonably foreseeable when sufficiently likely to occur that person of ordinary prudence would take it into account in reaching decision
• EIS must discuss only \reasonably foreseeable\ impacts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).