Skip to main content
· 1/25/1985

Federal Case

Citations

  • 753 F.2d 120
  • 243 U.S. App. D.C. 302
  • 22 ERC (BNA) 1199
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[a]n agency has broad discretion” in conducting its NEPA review
  • finding that the agency’s decision to analyze cumulative noise level rather than individual event noise level was entitled to discretion because determining the proper testing methodology is within the agency’s expertise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.