Sierra 76, Inc. v. TA Operating LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the plaintiffs’ challenge as a “claim of racial gerrymandering to the Acts as a whole”
• rejecting plaintiffs' challenge because \[the legislature] followed no bright-line rule\ with respect to every majority-minority district
• rejecting plaintiffs’ challenge because “[the legislature] followed no bright-line rule” with respect to every majority-minority district
• construing plaintiffs’ challenge as arguing that the “Acts as a whole constitute racial gerrymanders”
• “The filings and arguments made by the plaintiffs on these claims were mystifying at best”
• the “record establishes that the drafters of the new districts, above all, had to correct [for] severe malapportionment . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).