Siekierka v. United Steel Deck, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that summary judgment should have been denied because both the employee and the employer presented sufficient evidence to support an inference that either of their proffered reasons for the termination could have been true
• “This is the kind of choice prohibited under Kelsay and if United Steel’s intent was to create this dilemma, its motive was retaliatory.”
• “This is the kind of choice prohibited under Kelsay and if United Steel’s intent was to create this dilem‐ ma, its motive was retaliatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).