Skip to main content
· 4/20/1965

Siegert-Mathewson Medical Group v. State

Citations

  • 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 112
  • 1965 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming judgment for the plaintiff, the endorsee of a bill of exchange, on the ground that, as endorsee, he had the \legal right\ to bring suit notwithstanding the fact that the proceeds of the litigation would be turned over to the endorser
  • affirming judgment for the plaintiff, the endorsee of a bill of exchange, on the ground that, as endorsee, he had the “legal right” to bring suit notwithstanding the fact that the pro ceeds of the litigation would be turned over to the endorser

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pezman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.