Siegel v. Thern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• omitting the word \junior\ from plaintiff's name in the judgment was immaterial since \junior\ is \no part of a name\ and recitation in the judgment made clear that the judgment was rendered in plaintiff's favor
• omitting the word “junior” from plaintiffs name in the judgment was immate rial since “junior” is “no part of a name” and recitation in the judgment made clear that the judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).